Wednesday, January 20, 2010

New Exhibition: Demons and Devotion


I'm sure you all have your calendars marked already for the opening on Friday, January 22nd of Demons and Devotion: The Hours of Catherine of Cleves at the Morgan Library. This Dutch masterpiece, circa 1440, and its iconic Hell-mouth (which I've been seeing a lot lately) miniature is long overdue for an exhibition.

The Morgan's show will display the pages, which were cut out of the original manuscript in the 1850s, glued back together and sold as two separate books to two separate collectors, unbound. At the end of the exhibition in May, the Morgan's conservation staff will decide how to rebind the pages in a looser fashion for preservation and storage. The show will display 93 of the 157 illuminations, though a facsimile version will be available to view as well. (You can get your own, for the low low price of $15,000.) You can check out a digital facsimile for free on the Morgan's website, here.

The show will also include a selection of 18 additional manuscripts from Flanders, all contemporary to the Catherine of Cleves Hours. For a peek at some of the stylistic points the exhibition will cover, click here.

As usual, the Morgan has a series of lectures and gallery talks associated with the exhibit, all of which look extremely interesting. I'm hoping to catch "The Hours of Catherine of Cleves: What Makes a Dutch Masterpiece," a lecture by Dr. James Marrow on February 24th. A complete calendar of lectures and gallery talks can be found here .

Thursday, January 14, 2010

So you think you can write a thesis?


Having just finished my own master's thesis, I'd like to share some of my tips for having a smooth and successful graduate thesis-writing experience. The word "thesis" strikes fear and apprehension into the hearts of even the most confident graduate students. The prospect of such a long and important research paper is daunting, but should be approached as you would any research paper. Take the process one step at a time, leave yourself plenty of time to complete the work, and don't stress yourself out!



Artifice
's Thesis-Writing Tips:

1. Pick a topic. One way to go about this is to use a research paper you've already written for another class as a jump-off point. Otherwise, it's OK to start with a broad topic. Don't be afraid to work on something that you really want to, even if you haven't done any previous research. The more interesting you find your topic to begin with, the less of a chore your thesis will be several months into it. As you begin to read and research, you will get ideas for how you might be able to specify the topic, where the material is lacking, and how you might be able to approach the topic differently.

2. Start researching early. Even if you don't end up using the material in the final copy, it never hurts to have a background in related material. That way you can be extra-confident about making your point. Getting an early start also helps you to pace yourself and really learn about whatever it is you're researching.

3. Use the resources available to you wisely. Your university or college's library has a treasure trove of online research options you probably didn't know even existed. Take advantage of any research workshops your librarian might offer, chances are that even if you think you're an internet-search pro, you'll discover something you never even thought to look for. Ditto for any public libraries. Don't be afraid to ask the librarians for help, most of them are happy to point you in the right direction or give you an idea for a different research direction.

4. Read footnotes and bibliography religiously. Any book you pick up that has anything remotely related to your topic will also have an extensive bibliography that will help broaden or specify your search. Some of the best and most interesting nuggets are buried in footnotes (I actually discovered the manuscript that ended up being my thesis topic at the end of a half-page footnote!).

Don't ignore these effortless research opportunities, there's a whole list of interesting books just waiting for you to look at! This also helps you to build a comprehensive idea of "previous scholarship" on your topic, which will be a central portion of your thesis.

5. Get citation software. Get it, use it, love it. I use EndNote, and I've heard that RefWorks is also a great option. These were both available as free downloads from my college's library website, so make sure to see if your school has a similar offer before spending the dough. As you're researching, enter every book/article/website you look at, no exceptions. Not only will you build an impressive library of citations, but your library is then searchable by author, title, keyword, etc.

EndNote has a cite-while-you-write feature that makes moving the data into a word document really easy, and has a multitude of formatting options based on your citation preferences.

6. Cite early, cite often. My trick for taking notes is to put page numbers down right then and there. I've never had to go searching for a citation 4 months after the fact, and having page numbers available without the book handy (common for closed-stack libraries) made citations much easier.

When you start writing, start citing (just a little rhyming thesis-writing maxim). Even if you over-cite or end up cutting out or moving things around, if the citation is already there, cleaning them up is a breeze.

7. Start writing. Everyone works in a different order, but in a thesis-situation, an all-nighter, a pot of coffee, and frantic last-minute research won't cut it. I found that beginning to write as soon as I had an idea of what I wanted to say made the overall task much less daunting.

I first created a long outline of what I wanted to cover, and a rough idea of how I wanted to break up the information. Then I just started writing. From there, the more I wrote, the more the information sort of divided itself and logical breaks for chapters/sections were revealed. Don't worry about length, specific organization, or perfectly polished grammar to begin with, you will edit (over and over and over again) for these types of issues.

8. Communicate with your adviser. You should have a clear idea of what your adviser expects of you over the course of the thesis. Do they want to see your draft in pieces, or all at once? Will you set specific dates for when certain chapters should be finished? These are some issues that should be worked out with your adviser in the early stages of thesis-writing, so that both of you know exactly what to expect along the way.

9. Edit. edit. edit. Once you have a draft that you're happy with, it helps to enlist the help of your fellow grad students for editing. Not only will you get feedback from them regarding clarity and flow, but the more new sets of eyes as you can get on your grammar and sentence structure (we all have weird little writing quirks that we can't pick out and fix for ourselves!), the better.

I'd also recommend your college or university's writing center. Normally staffed by extremely helpful English grad students, even if you're convinced you're the greatest and most compelling writer to ever write a thesis, they can help you polish and clarify.

10. Be prepared for and open to criticism. Take your adviser's and editors' comments and suggestions seriously. Be prepared to go back to the library and re-research some areas of your thesis, or do some new research to supplement and clarify your main points.

If someone says they don't understand something you wrote, don't take it personally, it may just need to be reworded. No first draft (or even second, third or fourth) is perfect! Outside criticism and editing is what will make your thesis the best it can be in the end.

11. Don't forget the little things. Pay attention to instructions from your department or adviser regarding formatting, any images, type of paper, number of copies to be submitted, etc. It sounds mundane and obvious, but making sure that these little details are correct will eliminate possible headaches and make the process of submitting your final copy much smoother.

12. Be informed and submit confidently. Be aware of official deadlines and any final paperwork that should accompany the thesis. This might include an official approval form signed by your adviser or the department, a binding fee, or anything else your department requests. Make sure that you understand these requirements and have them prepared in advance.

Congratulations, you've just written a thesis!

The Lost World of Old Europe

The Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, a relatively new department at New York University, has a really fascinating exhibition up at the moment of artifacts recovered from the Danube Valley. This "Old Europe" civilization of about 4,000 BC flourished before Egyptians even figured out what a pyramid was, but hasn't been given nearly any scholarly attention so far. This was actually the first time I'd ever even heard of such a civilization.

I haven't been to see the exhibition yet, but the ISAW has a brilliant online exhibition page that serves as a great introduction. It begins with some "burning questions" about the role of women and the practice of destroying their own homes while also introducing a few of the artifacts. There's also a preview of the exhibition catalog, as well as an object checklist that lists everything in the show. I'm particularly interested in the female clay figurines and the animal statuettes. More thoughts to come once I get in to see the show. If you've already been, what did you think?

The Lost World of Old Europe: The Danube Valley 5000-3500 BC runs through April 25th. Details and opening hours can be found here.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

The new Sutton-Hoo?

Cool early medieval news: An amateur treasure-hunter with a metal detector found a cache of Anglo-Saxon objects in England about two months ago. Consisting of about 1,500 objects from the 7th century, the hoard is being billed as the largest such treasure to ever be discovered. I'm most interested in the Christian objects, and it will be interesting to see what scholarship comes out of this (also, I can't believe anyone still uses the phrase "the Dark Ages" seriously).


Depressing art news: A Renee Magritte painting, Olympia, was recently stolen from a museum in Brussels.

A hilariously cliche-laden write-up about a discovery in a 17th century canvas by Poussin.

A telling interview with Thomas Campbell about his leadership style and what it means for the Met's exhibition schedule.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Met tidbits

This made the front page of the NYT online edition this morning: The Metropolitan Museum's "Portrait of a Man" that had been displayed as by the workshop of Velazquez has been reattributed to the master himself, after a recent conservation.

Keith Christiansen, chairman of European paintings and the country's leading Velazquez scholar, Jonathan Brown, are in agreement about the attribution, which basically comes down to a few individual brushstrokes on the man's collar (art history at it's finest!). Debate continues over whether or not this work may be a self-portrait.

In other Met news, the museum announced that it will show fewer exhibitions of major loans, and will instead focus on changing the presentation of the permanent collection, which I think is what we're seeing now with these small, single-painting shows. I've got my money on a "Portrait of a Man" show in the upcoming months!

Friday, September 4, 2009

Art Links

Hello dear readers, I apologize for my long blogging hiatus. I was in Paris researching some manuscripts for my thesis, started a new job, and time got away from me!

Here are a few art links and updates to hold you over for the upcoming holiday weekend:

-In today's Times, an update/analysis on how galleries are faring in the continuing bad economic situation. 57th St. galleries seem to be relocating to Chelsea, where some two dozen have vacated their spaces.

-The much buzzed-about show at the Met which is centered around Vermeer's Milkmaid opens next week, on September 10th. It will also feature the Met's complete collection of (5) Vermeers, along with a selection of Dutch works (which reminds me a lot of the show they put up a few years ago which featured the entire collection of Dutch paintings). I'm interested in the Met's strategy here. Considering the Michelangelo's first painting exhibition, the Vermeer show, and the upcoming show which features a single sculpture (attributed to Michelangelo), the Met seems to be trafficking in small-scale (but big publicity) Frick Collection-style shows. Low cost and high traffic, an interesting move for the Met. MoMA is doing something similar with their exhibition on Monet's waterlilies (which I'm sure will be so packed, it will hardly be the oasis MoMA claims it will be).

-For all of you medieval art dorks who've been anxiously awaiting the arrival of the newly unbound Belles Heures of Jean de France at the Met, the show which was originally scheduled to open later this month has been pushed back to March. (Also opening in March is an interesting show on medieval tomb sculpture from Burgundy.)

-The Walters Art Museum has a neat-looking show on miniature books, which pulls from their permanent collection.



Monday, August 3, 2009

how do we "look" at art today?

I just had to blog this article when I saw it this morning in the Times. Mainly because I spend a lot of time in museums, and one of my favorite things to do is watch other people look at art. Since the completion of the new Greek and Roman galleries at the Met, one of my favorite spots is the marble courtyard arranged around a fountain with a spectacular arrangement of Greek sculpture. Reactions range from shock regarding the statues' state of general undress to some people who took a picture of each other in front of literally every piece in the room.

I've often been struck by the urge to "collect" pictures of pictures. As if taking a picture of the Mona Lisa or Starry Night means that you earn some amount of invisible art points for having been to the museum it resides in, pushed your way to the front of the crowd, and snapped a badly-lit, off-center digital photograph of it.

What do you think? How do you look at art?